Archive: October 2006

First day with Rita Mae

In honor of Jessica Kennedy-Rockefeller's first day of work with the new library, the staff scrambled to bring in an author of national import. Though she had hoped for J.K. Rowling, Ms. Kennedy-Rockefeller appreciates that finishing Book 7 is perhaps more urgent than welcoming a new employee. Perhaps.

Instead, Ms. Kennedy-Rockefeller settled for an author visit from Rita Mae Brown, who turned out to be a very engaging, comical speaker. This flies in the face of all logic, as RMB co-authors books with her kitty, Sneaky Pie Brown. You just can't trust people like that.

Unsurprisingly, the staff at the new library were all very eager to meet the new employee. Undoubtedly this is because Ms. K-R's reputation precedes her, and not at all because everyone else can now stop working overtime.

It was mildly disconcerting that no one offered to accompany Ms. Kennedy-Rockefeller on her lunch break, but on reflection it makes perfect sense: the new coworkers must have assumed that Ms. K-R already had lunch dates with famous celebrities from her own inner circle. The new coworkers don't yet realize that Ms. K-R is gracious enough to dine with ordinary, everyday librarians. As her reputation for humility spreads, the other librarians will surely overcome their intimidation and venture to request the pleasure of her company.

As a final note, the masses may rest easy concerning Ms. Kennedy-Rockefeller's clothing ensemble for the first day. She did not, in fact, show up to work naked, as she had dreamt (though of course that would have been a stunning and satisfying display in many, many ways). Instead, she wore a knock-out, flowing orange skirt (which is actually too long for her, but you can't tell because she pulls it up to her boobs) and a conservative but flattering cotton black blouse. The shirt showcased Ms. K-R's elegant eighth-note tattoo; when pressed, her new boss said that the display of visible tattoos had never before been an issue, so until she hears otherwise, Ms. Kennedy-Rockefeller will proudly display her body art. Most of it, anyway; she might wait a bit before showing off the nipple ring.

Posted on Thursday, October 19, 2006 at 01:13AM by Registered Commenterthe lesbrarian in , , | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

Drug policy violation

Haven't even been in the apartment three days and already we've got two violations against the neighborhood drug policy. Goblin and Gremlin showed up stoned. I drugged them for the car ride to Wilhelmsplatz, and here it is twelve hours later and they're still glassy-eyed.

I collapsed into bed this evening at 7. I woke at midnight. Damn.

Apparently a very thin wall is the only thing separating my bed from the next apartment's noisy teevee. Damn again.

Can't get the wireless working. Gonna try a different router. For now I'm connected to the modem with a wire. What is this, the Dark Ages? It's like freakin 2003 all over again. Damn damn damn.

But that's really all I can complain about, unless you count my tummy, and how empty it is. I ate some leftover rigatoni this evening. Couldn't find a fork, despite having purchased two different sets of plastic utensils to tide me over till all the silverware gets unpacked. Had to use a paring knife. (Had never used it before-- glad to know it's useful for something. Glad I was even able to identify it, for that matter.) Sliced my lip. I suppose that's what you get for eating with a knife.

Also punched myself in the nose while wrestling with some packing tape. Should have used the paring knife on that box.

But overall I'm very pleased. Thanks to Dad, Crystal, Crystal's boyfriend Jon, or possibly John, and Crystal's 4-year-old Marlee, all my junk is here in the apartment. All I've got to do is unpack. I can get that done before I start work on Thursday. Right?

Posted on Tuesday, October 17, 2006 at 01:12AM by Registered Commenterthe lesbrarian in , , | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

Einstein. Goethe. Kennedy-Rockefeller.

This is the story of the smartest thing I have ever, ever done. What makes it incredible is that I was asleep.

At that time in my life I was seeing… let's call him Ivan Karamazov. (The guy didn't resemble IK in the slightest, but never mind.) Ivan wasn't the demonstrative sort. Nor was he the talkative sort. If you asked him a direct question he would grunt. I spent entire evenings with him without hearing him form a complete sentence.

We'd been dating for a few months and I had no idea what he felt about me. Did he think I was pretty? Did he enjoy my company? Did he find me annoying? Couldn't tell ya then. Still couldn't tell ya.

This complete lack of communication made me nervous. One night I had a dream about it, in which he wrote me a letter. The body of the letter was bland. It entirely failed to mention me, or his feelings toward me.

But the signature… Ah, that's the kicker. This is exactly what it looked like in my dream:

LOVE*

Ivan

*Lack Of Viable Ending

---

Let's dissect this. I was nervous about Ivan's lack of communication and I was unsure of how he felt toward me. My subconscious had him write a letter, but, in keeping with his character, it was vague. He signed it with what would normally be a very clear indicator, "love," but he was using it ironically. And why was it ironic? Because it was actually an apronym.

In my freakin' sleep I made a play on words. Not just any play on words, but a situationally appropriate play. It embodied Ivan's feelings and it did it in a (wryly) humorous place in his letter that further underscored his ambiguity toward me.

I suppose if I were really smart I'd figure out how to turn this into money.

Posted on Thursday, October 5, 2006 at 01:11AM by Registered Commenterthe lesbrarian in , | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

Sex! Sex! and more Sex!

For a change, I thought I'd be honest in the subject line. I really am going to talk about sex, and specifically, about orientation.

If you don't feel like reading about my personal bidness (which is, frankly, inconceivable) then skip down futher in the blog to where I talk shit about Dune. I just hate that book.

I don't want to keep my sexual identity secret. Three cheers for glasnost and perestroika! I don't want other sexual minorities accusing me of secreting it away-- though honestly, "lesbrarian" should be a bit of a clue.

Also, this could prove to be a big time-saver. Next time I want to date someone-- wait, no, that's ridiculous. Ms. Kennedy-Rockefeller does not deign to date people. She is saving herself for Johnny Depp. But other people, viz., everyone who meets her, want to date Ms. K-R, and this little essay can clear up some misconceptions for them.

Humor me first in a spot of lecture: Sexual orientation is typically not static. Think of it as a continuum. Allll the way on one side you have 100% straight, and alllll the way on the other side you have 100% gay, and most of us fall somewhere in between. Even better, most of us slide around on that continuum. It can change day-to-day, or it can change over a lifetime. You've probably heard a story about a woman who was happily married to a man, and then discovered her lesbian side late in life after he died. It happens.

Unfortunately, not all of us know where we fall on the orientation continuum. Lots of us don't even question it. I sure didn't, not for years-- this despite finding women physically attractive. Most people assume they're straight unless there's overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It's a function of our society's compulsive heterosexuality

The catch-all phrase for anyone who is not strictly, reliably straight is "sexual minority." This is cumbersome. The other catch-all phrase is "queer." Some folks still use it as a slur, but the rest of us are tickled pink about it, as it were.

End lecture.

I prefer to identify as queer, because my other option, "bisexual," doesn't really work. "Bisexual" implies that I view both sexes equally. I don't.

Oh hell, I need to lecture again. Sorry.

Sex vs. gender: Sex is biological. You have two main choices, male or female. (A tiny fraction of people are transsexual. Because of unusual chromosomes, they fall somewhere in between.) Genitals are a dead giveaway for sex. Secondary sex characteristics such as breasts or facial hair are usually good clues.

Gender is a social construct. It is made up. It is not caused by sex organs. Gender is assigned by society, by parents, by peers. Gender, like orientation, is on a continuum. You can be very girly or very manly or somewhere in between, and you can switch back and forth whenever you want.

Rule: sex is between your legs. Gender is between your ears..

End lecture, again.

Like I was saying, I don't view both sexes equally. My emotional responses are usually toward men. When I fall in love or get a crush, it's usually over a man. Because of this tendency, I was 20 before it occured to me that I wasn't straight.

Physically, I think lots of women and lots of men are hot. Alas, I think lots of them are unattractive.

And sexually, I prefer women. I don't really enjoy sex with men. Maybe I haven't met the right man yet. I'm not going to let past disappointments prevent me from future seductions. But women? Totally erotic. Breasts are awesome.

Unfortunately, I can't stand most women. This is embarassing to admit, what with having a degree in women's studies. I'm a die-hard feminist and, in theory, I am all about some womyn. It's just that particular examples can be so very irritating. I have trouble making friends with women. (Obviously.)

My perspective is stereotypically male: I think they're hot and I'd like to go to bed with them, but dear sweet Jesus I wish they'd shut up.

...Ah. In reading this over, I think I've alienated... let's see here... yes: I've alienated the whole human race. I don't want to talk to women and I don't want to sleep with men.

Well shit.

Posted on Wednesday, October 4, 2006 at 01:08AM by Registered Commenterthe lesbrarian in , | Comments3 Comments | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

WTFW...

I need this t-shirt:

http://www.cafepress.com/bridezilla.38182230

WTFWJD, indeed.

The brillliant thing is, the person responsible for this is studying to be a minister. I read about her in Bust.

For her, I'd get religion. I'd be the most faithful member of the flock.

Posted on Tuesday, October 3, 2006 at 01:07AM by Registered Commenterthe lesbrarian in | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint
Page | 1 | 2 | Next 5 Entries